STEPHEN GLOVER: If Keir Starmer is a man of honor, I wouldn’t try to influence the police

MY NUMBER 1 RECOMMENDATION TO CREATE FULL TIME INCOME ONLINE: CLICK HERE

sir Keir Starmer he likes to occupy a morally high place. It was from this elevated position that he demanded Boris Johnsonthe resignation is over Partygate even before the prime minister was fined by the side Metropolitan Police for attending a birthday party at no. 10.

The revelation that the Labor leader himself appears to have violated Covid’s laws by attending a riot in Durham on April 30 last year interrupted his untenable appearance of moral superiority.

Nevertheless, he tried to regain his natural habitat yesterday afternoon by climbing back to the highlands. He wants us to think that his promise to resign if Durham police find him guilty of violating Covid regulations is proof of principle. I don’t believe it is.

In his brief statement, the characteristically confident Sir Keir declared himself a “man of honor and integrity” and repeatedly insisted that he had not violated any of Covid’s rules.

If nothing else, he showed incredible indifference. My opinion of his political abilities has risen. When the evidence shows that he has broken the law, a large amount of brass neck is required to present himself as a completely virtuous and completely innocent man.

Starmer was portrayed with a bottle of beer in Durham last April, but insists no Covid rules have been violated

Meanwhile, his cunning deputy Angela Rayner (who was present during Durham Bean despite previous Labor denials) followed suit and threatened to resign if punished. Perhaps even more absurd, given his accomplishments, he also wants to demand a higher moral realm.

Most of us, if we were in Sir Keir’s position, would quietly wait for the Durham police verdict and accept our punishment if that were the outcome. But the Labor leader did his best to ensure that no fine was imposed.

His intervention was certainly planned to put pressure on the police not to punish him. If they were inclined to do so, they now know he will ‘resign’, as Sir Keir said.

In other words, the Durham Constabulary has the fate of Her Majesty’s opposition leader entirely in its hands. It will take a brave copper to impose a fine if it leads to the defenestration of the Labor leader, with all the political consequences that would result.

In fact, he told them: Come get me if you dare. But don’t make the illusion of playing with fire. At the same time, he seemed to have offered the police an exit clause. He stated that if they judge that a violation has occurred but refuse to issue a notice of punishment, he may not feel obligated to resign. Translation: Whatever happens, don’t punish me.

In short, he wanted to ensure that even if Durham police, after an investigation that could last up to eight weeks, finds that the rules have been violated, they will not be so hasty as to impose a formal penalty.

Remember that Sir Keir Starmer is a former director of the Public Prosecutor’s Office who is well acquainted with the workings of the police – much better than Boris Johnson, for example. Armed with this first-hand knowledge, he tries to influence the outcome of the official investigation.

He undoubtedly believes that if the Durham police save him a fine, he will be able to redouble pressure on the prime minister, who has already received one sentence from the metropolitan police and could receive new ones in the coming weeks.

Sir Keir says he was willing to resign if he was punished – so Boris has to pack his bags because he was punished. I mean this by saying that Sir Keir loves a high moral level, even though he is actually engaged in low politics.

Of course, everything could go terribly wrong for him. Durham police would probably have decided not to accept the hint and would have continued their investigations exactly as they would if Sir Keir Starmer had never opened his mouth.

Starmer and deputy Labor leader Angela Rayner, who also said she would resign if punished for Beergate

Starmer and deputy Labor leader Angela Rayner, who also said she would resign if punished for Beergate

If poor Rishi Sunak can get a fine of £ 60 for coming to a meeting early in no. 10, where an impromptu birthday party was held for Boris Johnson, Sir Keir’s participation in an event attended by as many as 40 people – where they ate curry and drank beer – could be considered a serious violation of Covid’s rules even by Durham Copper.

As for the pressure on Mr Johnson, the Prime Minister does not easily recognize the shame. Even if the Labor leader avoids the fine, he could emerge from this complication with a damaged reputation, and he still could not remove Boris.

Sir Keir is therefore playing a dangerous game with his political career. His calculation is that without intervention he probably went to punishment. He hopes he won’t be there now. We’ll see.

Whatever happens, I say it is a real threat to our constitutional arrangements. If Sir Keir Starmer had really been the man of honor and integrity he claims to be, he would have kept quiet and not tried to influence the Durham police.

.

MY NUMBER 1 RECOMMENDATION TO CREATE FULL TIME INCOME ONLINE: CLICK HERE

Leave a Comment

error: Content is protected !!