Five revelations from NASA’s public UFO meeting

MY NUMBER 1 RECOMMENDATION TO CREATE FULL TIME INCOME ONLINE: CLICK HERE

The first public meeting in history NASAAn ‘independent UFO study group’ has made major revelations about unexplained objects being followed ‘all over the world’.

It also included serious calls for additional resources for the study of UFOs, now more technically described as Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), to better encompass the range of sightings and cases under investigation.

NASA’s study group, made up of 16 experts ranging from physicists to astronauts, had a lot to say in their four-hour meeting, which covered everything from the search a foreigner artifacts to the problem of online harassment from UFO trolls.

The study group, the first of its kind from the US space agency, has been working since last June and is expected to issue its final recommendations to NASA at the end of July.

Here are the five main takeaways from yesterday’s meeting.

Five revelations from NASA’s public UFO meeting

The UFO study will comb through data on unexplained natural phenomena that have been declassified. Pictured is an image from a video shown during a US Congressional hearing on possible UFOs

Serious scientists want to search for alien technology in our solar system

“There is widespread, but by no means universal, belief within the scientific community that extraterrestrial civilizations exist,” astrobiologist David Grinspoon told his fellow UAP task force members.

“The same reasoning that supports the idea that ET civilizations can exist and be detected,” Grinspoon said, “also supports the idea that finding extraterrestrial artifacts in our solar system is at least plausible.”

Grinspoon, who previously served as NASA’s space exploration strategy advisor, then recommended that the space agency take the lead in finding these alien artifacts if they are out there.

“Most of the solar system has not been explored due to artifacts and anomalies,” he pointed out, noting that “NASA is the lead agency for solar system exploration.”

“This modest data analysis effort could potentially be applied to existing and planned planetary missions,” Grinspoon said.

It wasn’t the first time Grinspoon advocated hunting for alien “techno-signatures” in our solar system or even on our planet, calling the dismissive attitude to the idea “intellectual laziness.”

“Our young civilization has already launched five spacecraft that will roam the galaxy, and we are trying to figure out how to send small spacecraft to nearby exoplanets,” Grinspoon wrote earlier this year in The sky and the telescope.

‘Imagine what an obsolete ET civilization could achieve and what machines could enter our solar system in billions of years.’

“If NASA applies the same rigorous methodology to UAPs that it uses to study possible life elsewhere, we will learn something new and interesting.”

The percentage of unsolved UAP cases remains consistent with the past

The director of the Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), physicist Sean Kirkpatrick, told NASA’s UAP group that the number of military UAP sightings that his group would classify as “perhaps truly anomalous” would amount to somewhere between 2 percent and 5 percent of the AARO total . database.

This percentage is remarkably consistent with historical UFO and UAP unsolved case rates, including those of the Pentagon’s Cold War-era UFO Office, Project Blue Book, which reached around 4 and 5.9 percent in the 1950s.

Astronomers polled in 1977 by Stanford astrophysics professor Peter Sturrock, 2,611 members of the American Astronomical Society, yielded similar statistics: 62 astronomers out of 1,356 asked, or 4.6 percent reported witnessing or recording unexplained aerial phenomena.

Some academic scientists, including SUNY Albany physicist Kevin Knuth, have suggested that this consistency could indicate that the phenomena are more likely to be real and not just random noise.

Kirkpatrick recounted one example of an unsolved UAP case, a video shot last year by a US military MQ-9 Reaper drone in the Middle East showing a bizarre flying metal ball.

“This is a typical example of the kind of thing we see for the most part,” Kirkpatrick told NASA’s UAP panel. ‘We see you all over the world.’

“And we’re seeing them do some very interesting dummy maneuvers,” Kirkpatrick added. “I would emphasize that this one in particular did not demonstrate any secret technical capabilities and did not pose any threat to airborne security.”

“It will take time before we can come to any conclusion,” he said, “until we get better-resolved data on similar objects that we can then do a larger analysis on.”

The infamous ‘GOFAST’ UAP didn’t go fast at all

As one of the pilots screams in the infrared targeting video of the mysterious ‘GOFAST’ UFO, ‘Ouch! I understand!’

One of the NASA panelists, Josh Semeter, a professor of engineering at Boston University’s Center for Space Physics, presented a detailed analysis of the fighter jet’s trajectory relative to the ‘GOFAST’ UAP.

It turns out that the mystery object was actually traveling at about 40 mph.

“So that’s a speed consistent with the wind speed at 13,000 feet,” Semeter said, noting that was the calculated altitude for the GOFAST UAP.

Making such a compelling case that GOFAST was likely an object drifting in strong winds was possible, he noted, because of the technical readout and infrared video interface.

“Fortunately, the information needed to determine the altitude and velocity of this object is contained on the screen,” Semeter explained.

Online harassment has plagued NASA’s UAP panel

During NASA’s four-hour public meeting, several team members cited abuse from UFO trolls, angry skeptics and others, both online and within their own institutions.

“It’s very sad to hear about the harassment our panelists have faced online just because they’re studying this topic,” said Nicky Fox, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate.

“NASA stands behind our panelists and we do not tolerate abuse,” she added.

“Harassment only leads to further stigmatization of the field of UAP, which significantly hinders scientific progress and discourages others from studying this important topic.”

Daniel Evans, also of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, assured the panel that ‘Nasa’s security team is actively addressing this issue.’

NASA board wants tools to seriously study UAP

Former senior NASA official Mike Gold, now executive vice president of the private space company Redwire, expressed the opinion that NASA should establish a permanent office to study UAPs, and his colleagues sounded no less serious.

A recurring theme of the public meeting was the need for better quality data, not just from UAP cases, but more data from many more mundane things that could be mistaken for truly unusual phenomena.

Panel member and astronomer Federica Bianco emphasized that UAP researchers will need “a thorough and deep understanding of what is normal in order to discover what is unusual.”

The chair of the study group, astrophysicist David Spergel, has repeatedly emphasized the need for better equipment and data collection methods if NASA or any other research organization is to successfully tackle the UAP issue.

“To sum up what we’ve learned in a month, we need high-quality data,” said Spergel, who has devoted much of his professional life to finding meaning in faint signals from deep space.

“The lesson of my career is that you want to address important questions with high-quality data and well-calibrated instruments.”

.

MY NUMBER 1 RECOMMENDATION TO CREATE FULL TIME INCOME ONLINE: CLICK HERE

Leave a Comment

error: Content is protected !!